Obama lies about Clinton E-mails

In 2003, members of my Air Force Reserve unit were asked to obtain a government email address. The only caveat was your government e-mail could only be  accessed by a government computer. Of course, one then had to take a computer security course and then pass a test. The gal that was running the computer department seemed to be out of her mind too.

So, I took the test, received a government email address and then tried to log on. The computer we had in the engineers section was old. It had 4 megabytes of RAM. My current laptop has 6 gigs of ram.  The log in process took approximately 15 minutes. I asked the computer gal if she could load the computer with more ram, but she said she had no budget.  I then said I would buy the  $30 516 MB RAM and install it myself. She said that this was illegal. So, I shit canned the idea of using government computers all together, and used my own email address.

That was 2003. By the time Hillary Clinton became SOS in 2009, there was copious money for computers.  George Bush had just created the DHS . In addition, the NSA budget was bursting at the seems.  Not only did we have to contend with the military industrial complex, we now had the rise of the surveillance industrial complex.

All official email traffic by a cabinet member should be a matter of record. Hillary Clinton used her own email? She was on the Watergate commission  which sought the Nixon tapes, but she uses her own email? She used the NSA to eves drop on foreign leaders, but uses a private email server for government use?

Enter Barack Hussein Obama. He says he did not know Hillary was using her own email. The absence of .gov should have been a dead give away. Then again, Barack Hussein Obama pleaded ignorance of Benghazi and ISIS, so cut him a little slack for not knowing that his secretary of state was using an email server in the basement of her house.

At this juncture, if Obama will lie about an email issue, he should be censured for the remainder of his presidency. As far as J. Edgar Benghazi Hillary using her personal basement email server? She should have Susan Rice go on national television and blame it on a video. What difference does it make?


Bloomberg Politics Mark Halperin and John Heilmann plugging damage limitation for J. Edgar Benghazi Hillary

Calling it “Email-Gate-Ghazi-Gate,” Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin and John Heilemann will broadcast a special report tonight devoted entirely to Hillary Clinton, her personal email, and the furor brewing around it all.

As we recall, some have stated that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama used the NSA to eves drop on foreign leaders. In fact, while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State,  Barack Hussein Obama was wire tapping  or “signal tapping” German Chancellor Merkel’s cell phone. They went on to wiretap the Associated press.

Of course then there is the Clinton propensity to  bring FBI files to the whitehouse , so they can cruise other people’s private information.



Hillary Clinton using a private email server when Secretary of State seems to be a massive breach of sound protocol.  Hillary put foreign diplomats under surveillance while using a private email server in her house?

So, I figure that Halperin and Heilmann will attempt to plug for Hillary. They will seek damage limitation on a woman who has a legacy of shady and unethical behavior. Benghazi Hillary messed up and allowed Ambassador Stevens to be executed. She then allowed Susan Rice to lie about it. Next? She has her own email server that has the capability to erase data. Hillary feels that the American people are not privy to her official emails, but will support the absconding of our 4th amendment rights and massive NSA Surveillance. She can look in on Americans, but we cannot see the historical record of a Secretary of State?  What a “Catch 22”.

I personally trust Hillary Clinton as far as I can throw her.  She is a political chameleon  control freak with a narcissistic personality disorder that will do anything for power.

Embedded image permalink


Can J. Edgar Benghazi Hillary be trusted with the NSA?

  1. Synchronicity is the occurrence of two or more events that appear to be meaningfully related but not causally related. Synchronicity holds that such events are “meaningful coincidences”. The concept ofsynchronicity was first defined by Carl Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist, in the 1920s.

Hillary Clinton was on the Watergate commission. She was forced to resign because of some shady behavior.

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

Hillary Clinton may have been involved with “File Gate!”


General Petraeus got in trouble for a few so-called classified emails sent to Paula Broadwell. Holder held it over his head while Hillary Clinton used her own email system? The server was at her house.

Hillary Clinton uses her own email server and non government email when  Secretary of State?

Obama and Hillary  have wiretapped foreign leaders.  They used the NSA to eves drop on allies. Nixon wiretapped Watergate, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama wiretapped the world.

Hillary seems to be a female version of J. Edgar Hoover.

If the IRS is any indication, we cannot trust Hillary Clinton with  NSA capability.

At this juncture, Americans cannot trust Hillary to tell the truth about anything. We cannot trust her from Watergate to Filegate to Benghazi.

Image result for j edgar hoover and nixon

Benjamin Netanyahu rocks the house that Brodheads built

I watched Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech on Capitol hill. He is an awesome speaker and did not miss a beat. Everyone in Congress was completely focused on Bibi.

I looked for Pennsylvania Congressman Tom Marino  to see his distinguished figure to no avail.  Richard H. Brodhead  served the 10th district. The same district Tom Marino serves today. The very house chamber that Tom Marino serves in was built by bills passed by the Congress that Richard H. Brodhead served in. In fact, the West wing, East wing, Library and Dome of the Capitol building were funded during Richard H. Brodhead’s tenure. Richard would be on the library committee.

Richard H. Brodhead would be the ultimate job creator for Pennsylvania. He would author and help pass legislation that created  and funded the initial topography surveys for the Transcontinental railroad. This reality would later pave the way for the rise of Bethlehem steel along with Pennsylvania’s once mighty steel industry.

It is quite ironic. The House that our Congressmen serve in was built via legislation co authored by my great plus grand uncle.  The dome that was built via legislation by our family name is once again surrounded by scaffolding. It is being rebuilt. Even Benjamin Netanyahu evoked the Dome card. Meanwhile, the house that Richard H. Brodhead lived at is in a state of dilapidation. The same house that some of our “Founding fathers” lived at.

So Tom, whenevre you take your seat in the House chamber, remember that the Brodheads have their name on it. While, the Dome is being repaired, the Brodhead Homestead is being allowed to disintegrate.



hellerBill 460 of 647,



The 2016 Neocon Bush clone warriors

They say that those that do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.  I find it odd that George W. Bush, the history major, repeated the sins of Vietnam and the  lessons learned from the Shaw of Iran.  Now we have neocon ass kisser Republican presidential candidates seeking to repeat the sins of Bush 43.

The Republican field of presidential candidates are engaging in fear mongering and an all out neocon rim job orgy fest for donations.

Best of Times or Worst of Times?

Best of Times or Worst of Times?

Share via email

Share on TumblrShare

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Last week, John Kerry seemed to be auditioning for the role of Dr. Pangloss.

Despite jihadi violence across the Middle East and ISIS terror in Iraq and Syria, Kerry told Congress, we live in “a period of less daily threat to Americans and to people in the world than normally — less deaths, less violent deaths today than through the last century.”

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper appeared to undercut Kerry the next day when he testified, “When the final accounting is done, 2014 will have been the most lethal year for global terrorism in the 45 years [since] such data has been complied.”

From January through September 2014, said Clapper, there were 13,000 terrorist attacks that killed 31,000 people. Afghanistan and Pakistan accounted for half of these attacks. And the Islamic State ranks first among terrorist organizations.

Yet, is Kerry wrong?

Despite our outrage over the barbarity of ISIS — beheadings of journalists and aid workers by “Jihadi John,” and of Christians on a beach — this century does not remotely rival in evil the bloodiest century of them all, the 20th.

From 1914-1918, nine million men died in the Great War. A comparable number of civilians perished.

At war’s end came the Russian Revolution and civil war, the Red Terror of Lenin, the genocide of the kulaks, the Holodomor in Ukraine and Stalin’s Great Purge of the ’30s.

Stalin’s butcher’s bill alone has been estimated at 30 million.

From World War II, 1939-45, European and Asian theaters together, the dead are estimated at another 50 million.

From 1945-49, in the Chinese civil war between the Communists of Mao Zedong and the Nationalists of Chiang Kai-shek, millions more died. The 1947-48 war in the subcontinent that severed Pakistan from India also consumed millions of Hindu and Muslim lives.

Came then Korea and Vietnam, where the U.S. dead totaled well over 90,000, and the Korean and Vietnamese dead numbered in the millions. Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge produced a million dead Cambodians in their first year in power in 1975.

The Biafran War of secession from Nigeria from 1967 to 1970, the Derg coup in Ethiopia in 1974 and subsequent Marxist rule until 1991, Rwanda in the 1990s, were each responsible for over a million deaths.

World War I gave us poison gas and starvation blockades; World War II provided ethnic cleansing, genocide, saturation bombing of cities and women and children, with the firestorms of Tokyo, Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki the grand finale.

Does not Kerry have a case?

We Americans lost more than 600,000 dead from 1861-1865, and another 600,000 died in World Wars I and II, Korea and Vietnam.

In this century, in Afghanistan and Iraq, the two longest wars in our history, the death toll is 7,000 — a terrible loss, but a tiny fraction of the number of Americans lost in wars during many of our lifetimes.

What Americans seem to lack today is a sense of perspective and what Mark Twain called “the calm confidence of a Christian with four aces.”

Jihadi John is a psycho, a sicko, a Charlie Manson who is loving all this publicity. He is not an “existential threat” to the United States.

Nor is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, or as he now calls himself, “Caliph Ibrahim,” who told his American captors who handed him over to Iraqi authorities in 2009, “I’ll see you guys in New York.” Not likely, Abu.

This is not to say that America should dismiss the revolutionary forces roiling an Islamic world of dozens of nation states. If the Sunni regimes do not cope with this challenge, the epidemic could engulf them.

But as threats to the United States, ISIS, al-Qaida and Boko Haram are pathetic compared to Hitler’s Reich, Tojo’s Japan, or the nuclear-armed “evil empire” of the Cold War.

During the height of the Vietnam War in 1968, we were losing 200 dead a week. During World War II, it was 2,000 dead a week.

How many Americans are dying each week at the hands of ISIS?

Make no mistake. These terrorists can bring down an airliner, shoot up malls, blow up buildings and kill a number of us. And they will behead any American who falls into their hands. But they cannot run a country. And they cannot defeat the United States.

Let us put this peril in perspective.

Each year, 33,000 American die in auto accidents and tens of thousands die of the flu. Last week, the Center for Disease Control reported that in 2011 alone, Clostridium difficile, or C. diff, a disease this writer had never heard of, caused 15,000 deaths in the USA.

How many American deaths did ISIS cause?

As the Shiites are already engaged against ISIS, we should inform our Sunni friends — the Turks, Egyptians, Saudis, Gulf Arabs: As you are the most threatened here, you are the first responders to this blaze.

We will have your back, but we will not fight your war for you.

Share via email

Re-engining the B-52H: The ultimate global anti terrorism weapon system

The current TF33-P3 turbo fan engines on the B-52H bomber are basically under powered polluting pig engines. At approximately 17,000 pounds of thrust each, the eight engines of the B-52H could be replaced with four  PW-1000G gear driven turbo fans with 35,000 pounds of thrust each.. This would effectively double the combat range of the aircraft  from 9000 miles to 18000 miles. It would extend the aircraft’s combat radius from from 4500 miles to 9000 miles. This means that a B-52H with PW1000G engines  could take off  fully loaded from Barksdale AFB , Louisiana and fly to the Middle east  and back without air refueling.

The B-52H could also eliminate both the Bombing Navigator and the Navigator positions in favor of a crew rest area for a crew of 4 pilots.  This would allow the B-52H to respond to specific terror threats anywhere in the world with zero use of air refueling assets. Fuel costs for training missions would be cut in half.

Coordinating a tanker air refueling event is both costly and a hassle. Without the air refueling requirement, re-engined B-52H bombers could respond to a terror threat in the Middle East within 15 hours.  Precision weaponry can then take out specific targets , heavy armor, and logistics centers.

A cell of 20 re-engined B-52H bombers could carry 1,760,000 pounds of bombs to anywhere in the Middle East, loiter for several hours, and then rain hell down on Muslim extremists. This could be done without one single KC-135 tanker passing gas. Around the clock bombing campaigns on locations in the gulf could be conducted from bases within the continental United States.

A new bomber program would cost hundreds of billions. Re-engining the B-52H could be ass low as $10 to $15 million per aircraft. The entire fleet could be re-engined for between between $750 million and $1.2 billion.  George Bush will have spent between $4 trillion and $6 trillion on Iraq and Afghanistan. In reality, the B-52H could have been used to reduce Al Qaeda safe havens in Afghanistan. Then we could have offered Afghans $10 million in foreign aid to keep terrorists out of the country. Instead, Bush engages in Marshal Plans for Muslims 10,000 miles away. At a million per troop to deploy, every so-called terrorist kill in Afghanistan cost a bout a $billion a piece.

In the future, Americans should simply respond to acts of terror with a massive bombing campaign. Eventually, extremists will get the point.

Ar refueling events can give away a position and requires air traffic control engagement.  This happened when Reagan attempted to get Gadafi with FB-111s.

10 re-engined B-52 s could fly unrefueled to North Korea, enter a low-level route and bomb 200  separate targets in North Korea with precision-guided ACLM AGM-86Bs with either 3000 lbs of conventional high explosives or megaton nuclear capability.  This means that if Kim Jong Un ever launched a  nuclear weapon, he and all his old fart generals would have nowhere to hide.   The only thing left of them would be melted gold teeth fillings, soju bottle caps and 5 tons of stupid melted military medals.

Soon the galant peoples of North Korea will rise up and kill off Kim Jong Un and his self-serving generals.

As it is, Kim Jong Un is putting all of North Koreas people at risk. a noble North Korean would put a bullet hole in Kim Jong Uns forehead.

I used to work on these aircraft. My Uncle flew it.

My dad directed B-52 strikes in Vietnam

Ressurection of the Ghost Rider


Karl Rove’s new book “The consequences of incompetent foreign policy”

When I was activated for Iraq in February 2003, I was 42 years old. I was looking forward to my 20 year letter for retirement from the Air Force Reserves. I was a Flight Engineer in one of the last two C-141 wings in the Air Force inventory. We were tasked with hauling the wounded from Iraq to Germany and Washington DC.  After decades of peace time, and only a year away from 20 good years for retirement, the thought of war and activation were somewhat frightening. I would end up shutting a business down of 8 years and living at March AFB for 18 months during the activation. I would end up performing dozens of medevacs and over 100 Iraq war related sorties.  I would also fly one of the last C-141 aircraft to the bone yard and be present when the 730th Airlift Squadron was deactivated.

I started flying in 1991. A year later, Clinton would be elected. During Clinton’s entire 8 years, the Federal government and military spending grew very little. That would all change when George W. Bush took office. By the time Bush 43 finished his 8 years with an approval rating of 25, The Middle East was in turmoil, the US economy was devastated, and hard federal revenue had rolled back by a full 25%. The once Clinton military of $300 billion was now a $900 billion Bush surveillance and police state. Unemployment was over 11%, and yearly deficits were primed to eclipse $1 trillion for the next 5 years. Unlike Bill Clinton, who kept government  growth and spending in check, Barack Hussein Obama would put the peddle to the metal.  Between Reagan, Bush 41, Bush 43, and Barack Hussein Obama, the national debt will hit $20 trillion in short order.

Bush 43 called himself a compassionate conservative.  After 911, the Bush foreign policy devolved an orgy of special interest spending and kill this kill that. He also told the American people that he would not use the US military for nation building. Then he did the complete opposite.  He would also lie to our faces concerning NSA surveillance. Bill Clinton lied about a blow job and the only casualty was a stained blue dress. George Bush lied about absconding our right to privacy and called it the “Act of a Patriot?”  The casualties of Bush incompetence are $4 to $6 trillion in war related costs, a Joesph Goebbels style surveillance state, and $15 trillion in deficit spending. Not only did Bush 43 increase military spending, he created a massive surveillance state.   While our troops were fighting and dying for “Marshal plans for Muslims 10,000 miles away, George W. Bush was absconding their “Bill of Rights” here at home.  Richard Nixon wire tapped Watergate. George W. Bush wire tapped every American citizen. The Bush 43 presidency was the “Shock and awe shit presidency!”

Bill Clinton could be considered the last of the Southern Conservative Democrat. Compared to Bush 43 and Barack Hussein Obama, Clinton was a demonstrable conservative.  Geedub was more like a military industrial complex and  surveillance industrial complex front man ass kisser. His cabinet and advisers were incompetent front men for special interest and perpetual war..  Barack would double down on all things Bush,  war spending and also create a medical industrial complex. Except for a few social positions, Barack Hussein Obama is a Bush protege.

By the time Lyndon Baines Johnson  finished his presidency in 1968, many Americans hated his guts. This contempt would be projected onto Hubert Humphrey, hence, the rise of RFK.  75% of Americans believed that George W. Bush was doing a lousy job as president. Many Americans hate his guts. This contempt is now being projected onto his brother Jeb. Most Americans believe that Jeb Bush is in a state of denial.  He thinks that he can overcome his brother’s 25% approval rating and the worst American economy since Herbert Hoover. I mean Hitler’s brother had a better shot at chancellor of Germany in 1946 than Jeb Bush has at winning the presidency of the United States of America in 2016.

Jeb Bush says he is his own man as he seeks a $100 million in special interest campaign contributions from the Bush donation list. A donor list that made huge sums of money during Iraq and Afghanistan.  He has also stated that Obama should have maintained all the gains made in Iraq? Bush blames Iraq for 911, removes Saddam Hussein and plunges Iraq into civil war. Jeb Bush blames Barack Hussein Obama for not maintaining his brothers gains in Iraq? It is clear that Jeb Bush is a Neocon ass kisser.

Karl Rove should write a follow on book after “Courage and Consequences”. It should be called the “Consequences of incompetence” As far as Jeb Bush? He wants to follow in his Brothers’s incompetent foot steps. In fact, Jeb Bush and George W Bush are two peas in a pod.

“Live free or die!”

Rove, Bush Jnr, Rumsfeld & Cheney.



Is Marco Rubio the real deal?

Anyone who listens to Marco Rubio undertsands that he speaks from the heart. His demeanor and articulation are infectious. He is probably the only Republican on Capitol Hill that can endear himself to the Hispanic vote.

Rubio has stumbled on his positions relating to amnesty for illegals. As we recall, Eric Cantor was removed from office for dangling amnesty. Marco will have to evaluate the debates from 2012.

The winning position for Marco Rubio among conservatives would encompass the following: Border security, amending the 14th amendment, and expanding worker visas. When these fundamentals are accomplished, Republicans could then go forward with  considering paths to citizenship for illegals with grown children that were born in the USA. Massive deportation is a massive pipe dream. The best position is to talk about border security, and defining the 14th amendment.

On a national debate stage, Marco Rubio would be quite formidable. I personally like the way he talks and his second generation Cuban Floridian draw. It is clear that Marco Rubio comes from a good family. He is a fighter.  On the national debate stage, people will be drawn to Marco Rubio because of his honesty of character and ability to articulate intelligently. Americans will be more amiable to listening to 4 years of Marco Rubio than Jeb Bush. Americans can no longer trust the sanity and honesty of the Bush family.

Marco needs to view some training films from Mario Cuomo. I think if he digs deep and articulates an inclusive message he will do well. In reality, Hillary Clinton would hate to debate Marco Rubio. Meanwhile, Jeb Bush is touting his Hispanic friendly credentials and “Act of Love!” He wants to fool hard working Hispanics into thinking he has their backs? From the family who squanders our young in inept foreign policy, and absconds our 4th amendment rights.

Bush trickle down economics is massive military spending and Marshal plans for Muslims 10,000 miles away. It is ok to spend $4 to $6 trillion on wars of choice, but screw health care here at home. Of course Jeb Bush will attack affordable health care or in-affordable healthcare really, while signalling more special interest backed warfare. The only place that the money trickles is to the VA budget and Iraqis that engage in perpetual religious slaughter.